94 Comments
User's avatar
Consciousness  Hub's avatar

Great interpretation, Jade. What you're describing as "Source" communicating through intuition, synchronicity, and that quiet pull toward expansion is very much in line with the larger consciousness system at work. In the Big Picture, this reality is a virtual learning environment designed to help us reduce our entropy — to move from fear toward love.

The key is discernment: true guidance from the larger consciousness system usually comes with a sense of calm certainty and low fear, even if the direction feels uncertain to the ego. When it's instinct or ego dressed up as intuition, you'll feel contraction, anxiety, or a need to justify it.

Testing it personally. That's where the real knowing comes from — not belief, but direct experience. Nice one.

Elska Bb's avatar

Mmm mmm appreciate this nuance.

Dare2look's avatar

I finally figured out that God speaks to me through my social media algorithms. When I need to see something, there it is.

Dr. Jade Teta's avatar

Ha... I think mine too ;-)

IGOR's avatar

That’s crazy, there is no God in social media or synchronicity, algorithm is algorithm.

Reminds me of people who still believe that seeing same numbers on watches, screens, pretty much anywhere is a sign of synchronicity or “ uNiVeRsE iS talking to me”.

Robin Shore's avatar

Really enjoyed this, especially this: “I was not a small fragment of something bigger. I was a unique vantage point of the only thing there is. I was Source experiencing itself from that one position, just as every other person, animal, and aware being is Source experiencing itself from theirs.” Just had a conversation about this with someone yesterday.

Dr. Jade Teta's avatar

Thank you for reading

Vlad Tverdohleb's avatar

Brilliant structural breakdown, Jade. The octopus metaphor perfectly illustrates what a dual-aspect monism looks like in localized operation.

What you’ve beautifully mapped out as the "Four Intelligences" vs. the "Familiar and Frustrating road" is the exact psychological footprint of a major quantum biological event. In my own research on Coherent Information Cosmopsychism (CIC), we observe that "instinct" loops are literally written as epigenetic malware in the cellular hardware, dropping cellular voltage and shattering quantum coherence.

Conversely, when we align with what you call "Insight" and "Intuition," we are engaging the Phase-Locked Loop. This alignment forces our cellular microtubules (via Orch-OR mechanics) to regain coherence, restoring the cellular matrix to its uncorrupted 5D template.

The "ELEVATED FLOW" and synchronicities you describe aren't just cosmic rewards—they are the literal thermodynamic metrics of William Tiller's "Ratchet Effect" permanently locking the physical body into a low-entropy sovereign ground state. Thank you for providing such a clean, accessible bridge between cellular memory and the fundamental information layer!

Dr. Jade Teta's avatar

Sounds like you are doing so pretty amazing things!! How do I learn more about your work?

Vlad Tverdohleb's avatar

Thank you, Jade. That means a lot coming from you—I've been quietly following your work and really respect the way you bridge clinical practice with the deeper layers of consciousness.

The best place to find everything I've built is my preprint on Zenodo: The Ogdoadic Synthesis: A Dual-Aspect Cosmopsychist Framework for Biological Ascension and Non-Local Healing. It's the full architecture—cosmopsychism, the Phase‑Locked Loop, the Ratchet Effect, all of it, mapped in detail. It's free and open‑access: https://zenodo.org/records/20488596

For ongoing dialogue, deep‑dive essays, and community discussion, I've started a Substack, The Cosmopsychist Frontier: : https://vladtverdohleb.substack.com. That's where the work is evolving in real time.

I'd love to stay connected—there's a lot of overlap in our frameworks, and I think we're mapping the same territory from different angles. Feel free to reach out anytime.

David Knight AscensionForYou's avatar

Hi Vlad... liked your info ref Jades post. Heads up... that first link comes up as Page Not Found ... peace. D

Vlad Tverdohleb's avatar

Thanks for flagging this, David. I recently updated the preprint, and the original DOI is not redirecting correctly right now. I am working with Zenodo support to fix it. In the meantime, here is the direct link to the current version:

https://zenodo.org/records/20488596

Appreciate your patience and your sharp eyes. Peace.

Wendlyn Alter's avatar

So right about how many people have these experiences but never talk about them because they seem too crazy. Again and again I've had people confess extraordinary experiences to me, only to deny them later. Sometimes they regret having admitted to it, but more often people literally FORGET. They pushed it out of their conscious mind - as you say, they had no framework for it.

My ex had the most extraordinary out of body experience - it thrilled me when he described it to me and I thought about it often. Years later I reminded him of it and he had no memory of it! How do you forget something like that?! It's because it didn't fit into his worldview, so he couldn't afford to remember it.

And I've seen that happen with others as well. We don't just fail to notice when "God is talking" - too often, we actively push it out of our awareness, because it scares us.

Dr. Jade Teta's avatar

So interesting. Yes, I think you are right. We have no frame for it ad so we try to make sense of it and then it becomes either forgotten, denied or more commonly revised to make sense.

Michael Perks's avatar

Here you go:

This resonated deeply. 💚

What I'd add to the receiver model is that I don't think we're purely passive in this.

From my own experience and understanding, the brain receives, yes. But the heart both receives and transmits.

Think of it less like a radio and more like a CB radio. It doesn't just pick up the signal. It sends one out too.

When we begin to regulate ourselves, clear what isn't ours, and align with what is genuinely true for us, we don't just tune into a different frequency.

We become a different frequency.

And what we then attract into our lives tends to reflect that shift.

Which is perhaps why inner work isn't just personal. It has a reach we can't always see. 🙏💚

Dr. Jade Teta's avatar

Yes, I like this idea. The best analogy I think we could have right now is a mobile device. It is obviously receiving and transducing, but it is also organizing and responding in the way it makes calls, reponds to texts, plays music, watches material engages on social media etc. The device has a living breathing signature which impacts the signal it receives. This makes more sense when you consider the brain and the heart are both made of the thing they are receiving and responding from and to. It is not a one way communication. It is a bidirectional and complementary relationship. We are extensions and expressions of source... cocreators.

Michael Perks's avatar

Beautifully put. 💚

I think that's the piece that often gets overlooked.

The signal we receive isn't separate from the state we're in when we receive it.

The more we change internally, the more our relationship with what we're perceiving seems to change too.

I like the mobile device analogy because it acknowledges both the receiving and the responding.

We're not just observing reality. We're participating in it. 🙏💚

MAE's avatar

I admit that I stopped reading this as soon as you, to your credit, shared that you used AI. Good luck.

Dr. Jade Teta's avatar

Yeah … good move. If your anti-AI I’m not your people and you are not mine

Beneath the Willow's avatar

What a delightful articulation! It fascinates me how Source seeds the same message, over and over again, in different languages and in different contexts but with the same fundamental conclusions. This one is particularly near and dear to my heart, as the Octopus is a profound creature to be revered and I appreciate the analogy so much. Thank you for this post!

Dr. Jade Teta's avatar

Thank you for reading.

Dr William R Schroeder's avatar

This is amazing what a fantastic post Hey it almost makes me run out and want to go into Coherent communication with the I mean this is fabulous I love it!

acting like mara's avatar

Holy crap I almost have no words for this. This made me think of how in animation you have figures emerging from and dissolving back into a whole. Like a morphing surface. That’s how I see it now because of your article.

Dr. Jade Teta's avatar

Hi Mara. Thank you for reading. I like that visual

Fatema's avatar

Have been on the intuition road for awhile....and it still scares me silly.

Tarkan Tan Teoman Topoğlu's avatar

This article came at the exact right time. I really loved it! You summarized everything perfectly and pushed me back in the right direction.

Dr. Jade Teta's avatar

Glad it was useful my friend

luckystarufo's avatar

Why it takes so long to explain. I mean, for a normal human being, if he’s talking then he’s talking. It’s not hard to hear if he’s really talking to you. In my humble opinion, a lot more people will believe in God if he could make it as simple as that

Andrey Kudeyev's avatar

Wow, what a coincidence. It’s very interesting that I came across this article. I recently wrote a book on this subject and would be happy to share it with you. I would really appreciate your feedback

Dr. Jade Teta's avatar

Congrats on that. 💪🏽

Kieran Hedges's avatar

Very original use of Octopus, and a great simplified piece about oneness. We should collaborate on a piece about enlightenment and life after awakening to this truth

Claire Drouault's avatar

I love this description of why individual truths are more valuable than any well intended universal truths.