Discussion about this post

User's avatar
<Tom Kane>'s avatar

Jade, watching a classically trained clinician admit that the brain functions

more like a receiver than a factory is a welcome shift. The biological reality

is that those emotionally charged stories do not just float in the ether; they

encode themselves directly into our cellular architecture via epigenetic

triggers and allostatic load. The radio analogy is the most accurate framework

we have to bridge the gap between abstract consciousness and physical tissue.

You are entirely right to stop dismissing the biological weight of a thought.

Dr Tom Kane

Tomás Guevara Calderón's avatar

What you’re describing here is the deep asymmetry between structure and experience — the way a person’s internal architecture selects one slice of reality from the full field of possibilities. The SIGNAL cascade is a powerful way to map how that selection propagates downward into physiology. What fascinates me is that the same pattern appears across psychology, neuroscience, and even physics: a broad possibility space at the top, and a single lived trajectory at the bottom. The mechanism that turns structure into experience is the missing piece across disciplines, and your work is one of the few that takes that transition seriously.

No posts

Ready for more?